PayPal

StatCounter

Monday, May 31, 2010

The Number One Threat

© MMX V.1.0.9
by Morley Evans


Netanyahu

The number one threat to everyone in the world today could be Big Oil which is currently represented by the BP oil disaster that is destroying the Gulf of Mexico, but it isn't.

The number one threat to everyone in the world today could be the international financial system which has run aground, but it isn't.

The number one threat to everyone in the world today could be a host of other very serious problems, but it isn't.

The number one threat to everyone in the world today is the so-called State of "Israel" which was founded on the racist paranoiac ideology called Zionism. From its inception 130 years ago, the Zionist project has been run by the criminally insane. The more we give them, the crazier they get.

Our governments unconditionally support "Israel" with billions of dollars annually, with vetoes in the Security Council and with weapons: Our governments gave these freaks nuclear weapons. They are getting ready to incinerate Iran at any moment.

They want to start World War Three and they are going to do it unless they are stopped.

The Israeli leader, Binjamin Netanyahu, will be visiting Ottawa on his way to Washington where he plans to shore up American support for a war that could turn the planet into a radioactive cinder. Our leaders are already licking Netanyahu's boots. Don't forget that the next time you vote.

I am usually sanguine. Today I tell you to be afraid, be very afraid. Wake up, chowderheads! SAY NO!

Israel stations nuclear missile subs off Iran
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article7140282.ece

Epilogue
Everyone knows about the "clockwork of events" that lead to WW I. One Israeli thermonuclear cruise missile tossed into Iran which is surrounded by neighbours with nukes would be very dangerous. The U.S. empire already has military bases inside the former Soviet Union. (How dumb is that? What if the Russians set up military bases in Arizona? Would Washington feel threatened?) The Russians have all the nukes the Soviets had. The Russians have more and better ones you can bet. China, Pakistan and India all have nukes. Our heroes are already destabilizing Pakistan. I doubt if Iran has any nukes, but that doesn't matter. The world is a powder keg and the Israelis are crazier than we are! Sane people will not use nukes because of mutual assured destruction (MAD). We should lock up nut ball Netanyahu as soon as we can slip him into a straight jacket and put him in a padded cell.

We must stop promoting crime and war. SAY NO!

Sunday, May 30, 2010

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Malcolm Kendrick, M.D.

© MMX V.1.0.7
by Morley Evans

Dr. Malcolm Kendrick is one of the medical experts who debunks the cholesterol hypothesis. This hoax has swept the world and affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people. The cholesterol hoax has helped no one. It has only enriched the pharmaceutical giants which were already over-stuffed with filthy lucre. Suffering from Gluttony and Greed, Big Pharma and Big Medicine need to be put on a Big Diet. That may not help them. Their condition may be terminal.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i8SSCNaaDcE

Why am I not concerned about my own cholesterol level which is 9.42 mmol/L (364.26914 mg/dl)? For one: people who have high cholesterol do not get cancer! For two: cholesterol does not cause Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Furthermore, I do not have any of the symptoms or problems the hypothesis insists I should have. Since I got rid of the cholesterol lowering meds that were killing me along with the doctors who had prescribed them, I am healthy for the first time in my life. I am 50 years younger than I was 5 years ago! Can you say that? Good nutrition, not advertising, doctors and pharmaceuticals, is the answer to malnutrition. You’d think the medical geniuses who run everything would be interested in me. They aren’t. Why not? That's because they are not interested in helping people nor are they interested in science. Their only interests are money and position. To Hell with them for what they have done.

Sunday, May 23, 2010

Incestuous

© MMX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

Do you live in a place where the same people control everything generation after generation? Has the population remained unchanged for decades? Have half your people left over the last 80 years? Are new ideas ridiculed and actively crushed, until they can be controlled by the élite which then acts as if it invented them? Do people claim "We have everything here anyone has anywhere," when they don't. Do you live in a backwater? Is home a few big frogs in a little pond where you are crippled and kept as a tadpole? Do your big frogs make claims that are ridiculous? Is your home feudal?

Your society may be incestuous.

incestuous |inˈses ch oōəs|
adjective
1 involving or guilty of incest : the child of an incestuous relationship: an incestuous bastard
2 (of human relations generally) excessively close and resistant to outside influence: the incestuous nature of literary journalism.
DERIVATIVES
incestuously adverb
incestuousness noun
ORIGIN early 16th cent.: from late Latin incestuosus, from Latin incestus (see incest).

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

War Casualties

© MMX V.1.0.3
by Morley Evans

Almost every night the telescreen reports something about a Canadian soldier who has been killed in Afghanistan or we see a funeral in Canada, or a flag-draped casket being loaded to be returned home. There is never any mention of Afghans who have been killed. We, Canadians, get even less reportage about Iraq because we have no troops there. But it is the same story. Unlike Canada's news industry, which wallows in war, the American news industry downplays American casualties. The Pentagon learned its lesson in Vietnam when the news reported American boys coming home in body bags every night. No more of that.

What does the media tell us about Afghans and Iraqis who have been killed or wounded or turned into refugees after their lives were destroyed? They tell us nothing. Canadians and Americans would be better off tuning in to Izvestia and Pravda than watching their own media or reading their own newspapers. One has to hunt to get the picture. Here is a glimpse of the carnage.

"Operation Iraqi Freedom": Total Coalition Military Fatalities 4715 since 2003.

"Operation Enduring Freedom/Afghanistan": Total Coalition Military Fatalities 1776 since 2001.

Estimating the losses of Iraqis and Afghans is more difficult. We don't bother to count them. "They are just dogs," said one U.S. veteran. But the totals are staggering. Without any difficulty and with no risk of exaggeration, one can say that hundreds of thousands have been killed, maimed, dispossessed, made homeless orphans or turned into refugees after their lives were destroyed along with their countries. How did these people live together for centuries with nothing like this happening before?

We can conclude that everything that has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan is directly due to what we have done in the last ten to twenty years. Of course we never stop. We have been busy in the region since before the First World War. Let's not forget Palestine, Egypt, Turkey, Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and North Africa. We are now doing the same thing to Pakistan as we are doing to Afghanistan. We are planning to do the same thing to Iran. Who will be next? Somebody will be next. Somebody is always next. We have been in this business for centuries.

Death and destruction is what we do. It is what we are good at. What about the "sectarian violence"? What we do well is turn one group against another so they do some of our killing for us. Then we can blame them for their moral failure and sanctimoniously extol the sacrifices we have made to help them. That is what we do best. It is our trademark.

We are so good. Even our enemies believe our lies. Then, after they have been smashed, they become our allies and join us as we do it to someone else so we can continue spreading peace, justice, democracy, human rights, equality and freedom. (We don't often call ourselves Christians anymore. Religion, as everyone knows, causes hatred and war.)

We are the most deceived people in history. We are worse than any of our enemies ever were. Take a good long look in the mirror.

http://www.icasualties.org/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Iraq_War
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2008/09/07/afghanistan-civilian-deaths-airstrikes
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/woundedplatoon/

Friday, May 14, 2010

Ashkenazi

© MMX V.1.0.8
by Morley Evans

Almost all of the Americans who identify themselves as "Jews" today are Ashkenazi from eastern Europe. They are descendants of the Khazars, a Turkic people who lived contemporaneously with the Byzantines, the Rus, the Mongols and the Arabs. Their Khaganate dominated the area between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea. The Khazars converted to modern-day Talmudic Judaism between the late 8th century and early 9th century. Most people in the Holy Land converted to Islam from Judaism and Christianity in the early 7th century. Jews, like Greeks and many other ancient people, had been living for centuries all over the near east and the Mediterranean area long before Christ. Yet most Jews, today, believe they are descended from the Jews in the Bible and that all the Jews lived in the Holy Land until the Romans expelled them after the Great Jewish Revolt against Rome in AD 66-70. The Palestinians today are far more likely to be the descendants of the Jews in the Bible than the Israelis who try to use the Bible as a land deed to the Middle East and even to the world. Moreover, the Israeli leadership has always been atheist, having converted to Zionism from communism and Judaism in the early 20th century. Contrary to Pope John Paul II who called contemporary Jews "our elder brothers in the faith," modern Talmudic Judaism is descended from Pharisaism which Jesus explicitly denounced over and over. It was the Pharisees who had the Romans crucify Jesus. They are "the Jews" from whom the disciples were hiding in the upper room. The word "Jew", itself, appears in the New Testament, as well as in the Apocryphal Books, Maccabees and Esther which were written before the New Testament was written. "Jew" appears rarely in other places. Earlier "Jews" are Israelites and Hebrews. "Jew" denoted someone who lived in Judea. Can one trace any person today over a thousand years back to the Khazars? No. Ashkenazi are a mixture like all other groups. Trace, instead of individual people, the organizations people create. Individuals in an organization are like cells in a body. Individuals die and are replaced but organizations can survive hundreds of generations. They have a life of their own. Their founding beliefs remain long after their founders are gone. Look at what they believe and do.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khazars
Shlomo Sand

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

Homeland Security

© MMX V.1.0.1
by Morley Evans

On the same night that the dud car bomb in Times Square was reported, a BP oil rig blew up, caught fire and sank in the Gulf of Mexico. Homeland Security heaved a sigh of relief in New York and congratulated itself for having kept Americans safe from terrorists. Are they doing a great job, or what? Meanwhile a huge oil slick is growing and moving toward the coast of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Florida where fisheries and shoreline habitats will be irreparably destroyed. Irreparably means forever. With that millions of livelihoods will be destroyed too. So who is the terrorist here? Is it the imaginary "Al Qaeda" and Bin Laden (boogey-monsters that were invented by the C.I.A. to terrorize the boobeoisie) or is it Big Oil? Who is going to pay for this mess? Not Big Oil that's for sure. Oh, yes: The defender of Americans in Washington has yet to restore the damage done by Hurricane Katrina in 2005.

Right to Life

© MMX V.1.0.0
by Morley Evans

The slogan "Right to Life" has been appropriated by people who wish to make abortion illegal once again. Oddly, the same people, such as Mr. Steven Harper, the Prime Minister of Canada, support criminal war and are big supporters of the military. Do the victims of their goons have a right to life? Of course they do not. They are defined by their killers as "the enemy" and they deserve to die. Women and children and other non-combatants are defined as "collateral damage". They are people who were in the wrong place at the wrong time when bombs were dropped on them while they slept in their beds. Are those who would force a woman to carry her fetus to term prepared to adopt love and nurture the baby for the next fifteen to twenty years? Of course not. Do people who do not support goon squads have a right to refuse to pay? Not a chance. We are not talking about rights or life. We are talking about power. Those with power do whatever they want to those who are weaker.